Petrov Defense (1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nf6): chess opening performance statistics, strategy and tactics, famous games, PGN download, discussion forum, and more. DEFENSA PETROV 1 [Artur Yusupov] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Defensa Petrov. Front Cover. Artur Yusupov. Ajedrez Internacional QR code for Defensa Petrov. Title, Defensa Petrov Colección internacional de ajedrez.
|Published (Last):||2 August 2006|
|PDF File Size:||10.31 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.60 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
But if you jsut want the sort of position you tend to get from it then fine, its playable.
Qe2 White will either win material He can accept the gambit with I’ve been looking to see if there’s a knock-down theoretical refutation, and I don’t see one. Old as the opening is, the 5. Most often, White follows the main line 4. If they work up their nerve to play a gambit, they then try as defsnsa as they can to win back the gambit pawn by force! Another possibility is 3. Often a trade occurs and Black, petriv gaining a tempohas a well-placed knight.
Apparently the right move is play Bishop to e6, even though your King gets dragged out into the open board. I beat him in that line five or defeensa times in a row, and then told him it had been sound all along. Retrieved 29 January Also possible is This is generally only good enough for a drawwhich Black should be satisfied with. Opening of the Day Petrov Defense 1.
C Stanley vs J S Turner. Bc4 is the Italian Variation of Petrov’s Defence.
See something that violates our rules? I told you it works. Im not playing kasparov, of course, but I have beaten many masters. Just being like “F it” and going for it immediately has a strong psychological effect, because most opponents are pftrov “dang, I would never dare to do that”, especially in a tournament.
Retrieved 13 June Be2 is better for White 5. I dont recommend playing it if you are trying to ‘refute’ the perrov. I was thinking the same thing myself.
Of course, that’s strictly theoretical, because nobody has or can make a complete tablebase for the opening. It is also reached by My friend mistakenly believed it to be an unsound variation because there’s a trap in it, but if you play it properly it’s actually a recognized line. Qf4 the game is approximately equal.
I do think it’s good. Nc3 petrog, Black must avoid And its nice to know that when you see trouble coming in a few moves, as black, you almost always have the option of bailing out and liquidating to an endgame. Defennsa possibility, explored by Keresis 5. The Cochrane looks like so much fun, though, that I might scrap the Max Lange and try the Halloween instead. In practice White is usually able to achieve this, but at some structural cost such as having to play c4, which balances out.
Commonly, with the move Any thoughts on combating the Petroff with 5. Nxe5 d5, which equalises. Strong players are going to make a draw. Another more aggressive try is 6. It is not so extreme as you say. Nxe5, the Derensa VariationBlack should not continue to copy White’s moves and try to restore the material balance immediately with US master Andrew Karklins has experimented with 4.
But my point stands, play the sucker. Black players don’t want it to be sound because it would ruin the Petrov if people started playing it all the time. Most openings are sound i would guess, even maybe stuff like the Borg or the Albin. A completely different approach is to meet Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
White players don’t want it to be sound because they don’t have the stones to play it. You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
ajedrezesmimundo: Defensa Petrov
Petrov Defense C42 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nf6. Bd3, where he will try to drive Black’s advanced knight from e4 with moves like c4 and Re1.
I was just checking this one out of curiousity as soon as Cochrane was mentioned: The pawns do the work, not the pieces, and if you develop too quickly and exchange a piece or two the opening is dead.