ACI 349-85 PDF

The authors note that current design methods (ACI and concrete capacity design [CCD]) overpredicted the pullout capacity as governed by concrete. Get this from a library! Code requirements for nuclear safety related concrete structures: ACI and commentary, ACI R [American Concrete. Reduced stress area calculation for anchorages in shallow members using equation () (ACI , ): Ac = projected area for limited depth = (a + 2hef.

Author: Tygole Juzil
Country: Barbados
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 23 July 2006
Pages: 162
PDF File Size: 16.35 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.94 Mb
ISBN: 871-9-73450-312-8
Downloads: 60728
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gukus

Finding libraries that hold this item Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway. Code requirements for nuclear safety related concrete structures: BoxRedford Station, Detroit Subjects Concrete construction — Standards — United States. The tension failure loads predicted by the CCD method fits experimental results over a wide range of embedment depth e. Write a review Rate this item: Nuclear safety structures code and commentary.

The name field is required. View all subjects More like this Similar Aco. Please enter the message. The authors note that current 394-85 methods ACI and concrete capacity design [CCD] overpredicted the pullout capacity as governed by concrete failure.

American Concrete Institute P. Please enter recipient e-mail address es. Please re-enter recipient e-mail address es. Search WorldCat Find items in libraries near you.

  DMRC PREVIOUS YEAR QUESTION PAPER FOR STATION CONTROLLER PDF

Bridges and other structures; Design; Highways; I The specific requirements or preferences of your reviewing publisher, classroom teacher, institution or organization should be applied. A total of 57 anchors 39 adhesive and 18 grouted 34-985 were tested under monotonic 439-85 loading. Preview this item Preview this item. Nuclear facilities — Design and construction — Standards. Linked Data More info about Linked Data. Concrete cone is one of the failure modes of anchors in concreteloaded by a tensile force.

Concrete cone failure

The E-mail Address es field adi required. Add a review and share your thoughts with other readers. The model is based on fracture mechanics theory and takes into account the size effectparticularly for the factor h e f 1. Views Read Edit View history. Retrieved from ” https: Remember me on this computer. Figures; Photos; References; Tables; Pagination: With the addition of steel fibers, however, the damage on concrete was significantly reduced.

Citations are based on reference standards.

Concrete cone failure – Wikipedia

Find a copy in the library Finding libraries that hold this item Please choose whether or not you want other users to be able to see on your profile that this library is a favorite of yours. In the case of concrete tensile failure with increasing member size, the failure acj increases less than the available failure surface; that means the nominal stress acj failure peak load divided by failure area decreases.

  IRIG STANDARD 200-04 PDF

For large head size, the bearing pressure in the bearing zone diminishes. An increase of the anchor’s load-carrying capacity is observed. Your Web browser is not enabled for JavaScript. Your list has reached the maximum number of items.

CONCRETE CAPACITY DESIGN (CCD) APPROACH FOR FASTENING TO CONCRETE

Anchors ; Models Subject Areas: A user-friendly, highly transparent model for the design of post-installed steel anchors or cast-in-place headed studs or bolts, termed the concrete capacity design CCD approach, is presented. You may have already requested this item. Allow this favorite library to be seen by others Keep this favorite library private.

Grouted anchors of 16 mm diameter were tested at 80,and mm embedment depths.

Don’t have an account? Create lists, bibliographies and reviews: Concrete; Filing Info Accession Number: The ultimate capacity of the anchors generally qci with increasing concrete strength. The use of both methods to predict the concrete failure load of fastenings in uncracked concrete under monotonic loading for important applications is compared. BoxRedford Station, Detroit ” .